IRRI-CRIL MBP Consultation with IRRI Breeders February 9 - 2009
From ICISWiki
Contents |
Synopsis
This page summarizes the IRRI-CRIL MBP Consultation with IRRI Breeders about the MBP on Monday, February 9th, 2009.
Agenda
The Goal of this Meeting
- Generation CP Gates proposal submission for a next generation Molecular Breeding Platform
- Start an enhanced process of stakeholder-driven software system development
- Just at the starting line…
The Experiment
- Try out the new ICIS web interface (without prompting)
Group Discussion: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly...
On the new ICIS web interface
- Firefox versus IE
- Browsing Trait names
- Get germplasm by country - timeout
- Get germplasm by name e.g.'pokkali', IRGC 15238 won't show the germplasm details (error)
- Pedigree
- pedigree window: appears empty (usability)
- when user selects different germplasm, open another pedigree window showing the pedigree tree of the currently selected germplasm
- request to filter by germplasm method
- option to supress the the display of germplasm identifiers in the node of pedigree
- feature request: back button takes user to previous screen/view
- feature request: pedigree- option to open all / several generations
- button to generate pedigree - move to top of germplasm details page
- options for pedigree tree generation
- add option for orientation
- show method checkbox: clarify, consider changing label to 'germplasm method',
- consider putting in instructions
- name searches for germplasm
- option to search from preferred name or other type of germplasm name
- search from all names
- apply the ICIS name standardization (e.g. IR64, IR 64 should combine search results)
- search by trait (consider synonyms)
- e.g flowering and 'heading date'- ICIS should know about the synonyms
- results list - sort all data from all pages
- study view: sort the values of the factors and variates
- new search string mode for germplasm: 'search by cross' where parents of the cross is delimited by '/' --> get IR???
- this is available in ICIS Browse.fcr command
- make timeout errors more user-friendly
- tabs: selected tab and sub-tabs in different color than the rest
- for hyperlinks: change cursor or color
- phenotype catalog: incorrect values loaded for plant / response mimic
- mutant search: show processing icon
Of ICIS tools in general
- General comments:
- All PBGB use IRIS and their own local database to plan work
- Capture data in their locals
- Only data managers in PBGB use the ICIS data entry tools - SetGen, ICIS Workbook
- Data managers (e.g. Connie) generate (printed?) copies of ICIS workbooks for each season
- Have hand helds to capture data for data capture, mainly heading date data, downloaded to PC for loading into a workbook; most other data manually written into notebooks
- Two breeding programs - rainfed and GUVA programs independently manage their data; all others have William and Connie to load data into their locals
- Hybrid rice - seed production uses SetGen, but phenotype data still in Excel spreadsheets. Still to work with William on local DMS
- Molecular marker program - not yet using ICIS extensively yet (to do)
- Problem soils program - ICIS used but through William's team
- CESD agronomists don't yet use ICIS for germplasm-based field evaluations (genotype x environment including management)
- Would like to retrieve all germplasm specific data across all studies for a given trait (perhaps, directly from a trait search result)
- Filter for specific range of dates
- Filter for specific locations
- Given a specific list of germplasm, want to retrieve all the available data for all available studies (across several seasons) for a specific set of measured traits, to allow global comparisons
- Values of the same Factor across all available studies for a given (set of) Germplasm
- Having some kind of statistic measures & visualization of data distributions of trait values across all data retrieved
- You might wish to constrain queries across a limited set of studies meeting a given set of criteria, e.g. common location, the trait measurement method used, common developmental stage.
- Mainly coarse filtering of data sets to retrieve enriched to the point where manual analysis (e.g. in an Excel spreadsheet) becomes tractable, perhaps for R statistical analysis (following standard algorithms, expressed as R modules?)
- Regarding naming designations, it would be helpful to have a glossary to tell users what the designation refers to, i.e. what Institute or breeding program or equivalent
- Question: why is the process of ICIS experimental planning and data capture for/from plant breeding so error prone?
- Dave Mackill: Grace (now William, Connie) have to spend so much time rechecking and correcting data in new crosses (might be "pre-ICIS" data errors, now controlled better with SetGen + workbook?) Pedigrees not entered by hand anymore... might not be a source of error anymore(?).
Molecular Breeding Tools - a wish list?
Marker Database
- Need an internal marker polymorphism database (SSR - past; SNP - future)
- Gel pictures with all experimental meta-data (gel concentration, standards used, etc.) indexed by germplasm (e.g. IR 64) and markers (e.g. RM20), where the lanes are documented for their contents (G x M)
- Markers by accessions - see Alleles
- e.g. IR 64 has been run by many groups internally
- Markers by accessions - see Alleles
- SNP's will be much easier to score
- Gel pictures with all experimental meta-data (gel concentration, standards used, etc.) indexed by germplasm (e.g. IR 64) and markers (e.g. RM20), where the lanes are documented for their contents (G x M)
- Although SNP's are coming, SSR's will still be used for some time to come
- SSR's more useful when calibrated against known, well characterized standards like IR 64
- Would it be good to have at least a well characterized database of "standards"
- What markers work best for genotyping, for given polymorphism
- SSR's more useful when calibrated against known, well characterized standards like IR 64
- Institutional versus technical issue?
- Not much incentive to properly document experiments for secondary use? e.g. clearly labeled gel pictures
SNP database
- Integrate with current tools for querying OryzaSNP
- Need an internal "local" OryzaSNP for ongoing genotyping of many additional lines genotyped
Genotype Analysis & Visualization Tools
- Visualize SNP alleles, for a limited set (e.g. 384) of SNP loci, in different colours, for distinct SNP alleles, visualized on a chromosome spread for two contrasting varieties, side by side
- Tool to select an optimal subset of SNPs available from a larger standard set, for a small subset of parental germplasm (could be more than 2 lines)
- Given target donors for specfied traits, want all polymorphic markers
- SNP quality scores
- Evenly spaced markers across genomic chromosomal (LD) "bins"
- Graphical genotyping tool to visualize current graphical (chromosomal) genotypes/phenotypes to decide at each generation of a pedigree, which germplasm do you select for advancing, that minimize the target introgression regions (foreground), while minimizing genetic background
Use Case Development – Phase I (NOT DONE IN THIS MEETING)
- Overview of suggested process:
- Brainstorming session on needs (whiteboard, simple enumeration)
- Prioritize for most critical needs
- Develop at least one (templated) use case on one function/need (as an example)

